These are the types of things employed by radical skepticism and that should be the form of philosophizing instead of and replacing traditional one-leveled and one-dimensional thinking, argumentation and reasoning In chapter THREE I illustrate many-leveled and multi-dimensional thinking, that are to me as a visual artist as well, of extreme importance. As far as possible philosophizing as an aspect of the processes of theorizing will be adhered to and realized. These limits require the re-interpretation of any philosophical tool being employed as well as the underlying assumptions and any pre-suppositions.

It also demands the focus on context-specific investigation of questions and the dealing of a particular problem in a certain context. It will for example prevent the traditional development of a general, all-encompassing and all-inclusive metaphysical system. This approach, set of values and attitude restrict the nature and the style of the meta-philosophizing. It misleadingly seems as if there is no progress in philosophy as, like in visual art, literature and music, each original thinker re-invents the entire discipline, its aims, purposes, values, methods, etc The nature of philosophical tools, methods, techniques and skills will be investigated and applied in terms of radical scepticism. A Meta-Philosophy exploration of immanent and non-immanent features of first-order philosophy in terms of the values of non- values or negative values of Radical Scepticism, Nihilism and Minarchy, executed to show how philosophizing is done.

Network effect martha wells